Recently in trademark fair use Category
March 9, 2010
Is Apple right? ... Since Apple's email has raised concerns, we reviewed our information. Conclusion: we're standing by our post. The Dear Rich Staff loves its Mac (and by extension that loves goes out to all Apple employees) and we can only assume that the Apple customer service rep who responded to you had a momentary lapse of judgment perhaps triggered by iPad hysteria.
Hassling Nonauthorized Resellers? Apple cannot halt resales of legitimately acquired U.S. versions of its products. But it can enforce its copyright and trademark rights which means that they may go after unauthorized resellers who use the Apple logo or name to imply Apple's endorsement, or who lift advertising copy or images from the Apple site. On that basis, they pursued unauthorized iPod sellers in 2005 and pursued unauthorized Mac resellers back in 1998. They will also apparently pursue unauthorized resellers who induce authorized resellers to breach their reseller agreements whatever that means -- we haven't located a reseller agreement, so we're not sure.
February 16, 2010
Overzealous Zazzler Zeeks TM advice
Square One Dept. A trademark registration for a name or text is usually not limited to a specific font; if that were the case, Nike, Gucci and Coca-Cola would have problems stopping ripoffs. Even if someone registers the word-mark in connection with a design, courts won't limit protection to the design. They will apply common sense to determine whether someone is trading off the mark unfairly and consumers are likely to be confused. So changing colors and fonts doesn't get you off the hook for infringement.
As for your questions ... Assuming someone registered FIRST KISS for t-shirts and cups, they would have priority over subsequent users on similar merchandise and could stop them regardless of the font. You claim that customers "would never be confused." If you can prove that in court, you might be able to get off the hook for infringement, but the The Dear Rich Staff believes that the chances of proving an identical word mark on identical goods does not infringe is little bit like Dr. Richard Kimble finding the one-armed killer.
Trademark fair use. Your second question is a little more complex and relies on interpreting the rules for trademark fair use which we discussed in a previous blog entry. As a general rule, descriptive use of terms is permissible. Again, common sense prevails here since a competitor's repetitive use of a descriptive term may be an illegal attempt to siphon customers.
November 20, 2009
Reach Out and Infringe Someone: Using Ad Slogans as Chapter Headings
Copyright law and fair use. As for using advertising slogans under copyright law, there isn't a problem. Copyright does not protect short phrases and even if it did, the use you described appears to be a fair use.
Trademark law and fair use. You can use a trademark (including slogans) for editorial or informational purposes without permission. That's because readers who stumble on a trademark within the text of a novel aren't likely to be confused into thinking that Hebrew National or Apple are sponsors of the book. There is a concept known as 'trademark fair use' that is distinguishable from the fair use defense applied in copyright law -- it's used as a defense to a claim of trademark infringement. In other words, it's sometimes asserted when a competitor uses another company's trademark to describe the goods (for example, the maker of an electric dishwasher may describe the "joy" of clean dishes without infringing the trademark JOY for dishwashing liquid). Some noncommercial uses of trademarked terms (such as described in your letter) -- though not technically trademark fair use -- are often lumped in the same category.
Want to learn more about fair use? Check out my book Getting Permission: How to License & Clear Copyrighted Materials Online & Off.
