Recently in sports Category

March 4, 2010

Claiming Rights to NBA Player Nickname

TM_onas_jerebko.jpgMy nephew has come up with a new nickname for the NBA player Jonas Jerebko from Sweden ("The Swedish Eagle"). He and his buddy have come to games with a self designed t-shirt that sports an eagle-like bird with a ball in the talons and the jersey number of the player, player's name on the back like a jersey and the player's country flag, as well as cardboard wings and have generated a little publicity for themselves and their concept. Pictures of them have been on a couple of websites, a newspaper, jumbotron at the arena and television coverage of the game. Jerebko also has signed the cardboard wings with his name and an "aka The Swedish Eagle." They are in the process of obtaining a trademark so they can sell t-shirts or other marketing kitsch. No one has the title yet. Can they print the shirts before getting trademark for "The Swedish Eagle" concept? Do they need Jerebko's permission? NBA permission? Can they use the shirts without his name? Do my nephew and friend need a partnership or can they register under both names? The Dear Rich Staff isn't very good at forecasting the future, but one thing we can predict with some certainty is that as soon as the NBA is aware of your nephew's sale of merchandise with the player's name and number, they'll get their lawyers to fire off a letter demanding that he halt the activity. We could be wrong -- and they may prefer to wait and see if it goes away itself. But if we were in your nephew's position, we wouldn't file that trademark application. As nice as the imagery and nickname may be, people are buying the merchandise because of its association with the player -- the use of his name and number cinches the association. The NBA, along with the various teams, controls the rights to exploit the player for merchandising purposes. So, he's stepping on those rights and the NBA usually doesn't like it
But we thought up the nick name ... As we've pointed out before, creating a trademark does not give you exclusive trademark rights. You get the rights if the mark qualifies and if you use it in commerce. Your nephew's application may be granted (or maybe not...)  but he'll have a hard time using it if he combines it with any insignia or text that identifies the NBA or its players. He'll also have an uphill battle trying to stop others from using the name in connection with Jerebko. If your nephew avoids any mention of the player name or number or other team identifier, he may be able to get away with his use and sale of merchandise ... it's a little bit like the recent situation in New Orleans. But the bigger his operation becomes, the more likely he'll be to run into trouble.
January 28, 2010

Who Dat Trademark?

fleurdelis.jpgDear Rich: Recently several small shops here in New Orleans, Louisiana have received cease and desist letters from the NFL regarding either the Fleur de Lis symbol or the Who Dat slogan and the Saints. This has been put on merchandise for years by local merchants and never been challenged before. Because we win now all of a sudden people are breaking the law? Do you know anything about this? Is it copyright infringement or trademark issue and which is it the Gold and Black Fleur de Lis or the words Who Dat? Can you explain this to me? I think with all that this city has gone through the NFL should be ashamed. The Dear Rich Staff is not sure whether NFL Enterprises LLC can feel shame. They're a limited liability corporation, not a person. Oh. wait a second, the Supreme Court reported this week that corporations are people, so maybe we're wrong. 
Anyway, as for your question ... This is a trademark issue and apparently it has been a hot topic in NOLA for the past few weeks. As everybody seems to acknowledge:  (1) the NFL has not registered the 'Who Dat,' mark (although several other companies and individuals are trying for registration or claim to own rights) and (2) the NFL/New Orleans Saints owns two fleur de lis design registrations (No. 3135839 and No. 3210572 -- shown above). Our research indicates that the C&D letters that are going out are for efforts that combine the two elements -  the phrase and fleur de lis. The basis for this claim would be that consumers are confused into believing that this merchandise is associated with the NFL. Certainly, the NFL would be hard pressed to pursue vendors selling only "Who Dat" merchandise. So far we haven't found any lawsuits and we assume some PR-savvy NOLA trademark attorneys will jump on the issue (as so many others have) should it head to court. In any case, for now it appears as if it's a Mexican standoff.
Must See Dept. As readers know the staff here doesn't care about football but we'll make an exception for the best football movie since Burt Reynolds scored in The Longest Yard. 

Find out more about trademark law and copyright infringement with my book Patent, Copyright & Trademark: An Intellectual Property Desk Reference.

December 30, 2009

Terrible Towel Satire? Uh ... not really.

103641-1.jpg
Dear Rich: We would like to spoof the Pittsburgh Steelers 'Terrible Towel' with a "We ARE Terrible Towel" for the Detroit Lions. It would be white with no logos. Satires can't infringe copyrights can they? Thoughts? If you're making one towel to hold up for the TV cameras, you're probably okay. But if you're thinking of making more than one, the Dear Rich Staff would advise against it. First of all -- it's not a copyright issue as copyright doesn't protect short phrases or individual words. 
It's a trademark issue. The term "Terrible Towel" was created by Pittsburgh sportscaster Myron Cope who acquired trademark rights and then assigned the registered trademark to a charity, the Allegheny Valley School, an institution for the disabled. Considering that licensing revenues from the towel have earned the school over $3 million, the school and the Steelers (who acknowledge that the towel is one of the most popular merchandise concepts in football history) both have a vested interest in preventing others from making and selling Terrible Towels. It could infringe and dilute a world-famous mark (and one that is carried to the far corners of the earth.)
Does satire matter? We must clarify one thing: you stated that satires can't infringe copyrights. That's not correct. A parody may be excused as a fair use under some circumstances. The same is not always true for satires. Here's a lawyerly explanation of the distinction. In any case, your use does not seem to qualify as either a satire or a parody, does it? Bottom line: sales and distribution of your towel will likely trigger a cease and desist letter.

December 1, 2009

Exploiting a Sports Award Trademark

iStock_000001718643XSmall.jpgDear Rich: I am the owner of a trademark of a once prestigious sports award. Can I have sports related products manufactured of the past recipients. Most have passed away and some are still living. I live in New York. Should I be concerned about "right to publicity"? Yes, you should be concerned about the right of publicity unless you have written permission or a license. (BTW, we think the "right to publicity" is for people like Kim Kardashian.) 
Owning an award doesn't grant an automatic license.  As for your trademark ownership, we would need more information before responding, but assuming it's a registered trademark like this one, it seems like your rights are limited to promoting the award, not the individuals who receive it. If that were not the case, then anyone could provide awards to sports stars and then make money off their names and personnas. Perhaps a listing of the names of all winners may be excused, or perhaps a t-shirt listing all of the winners in a category or for a time period would not violate a sports star's right of publicity but in general, we believe sports stars will object and will likely prevail in these types of claims. Keep in mind that one of the landmark cases establishing the right of publicity took place in New York and involved a baseball player. 
 
Want to learn more about the extent of trademarks? Check out my book Patent, Copyright & Trademark: An Intellectual Property Desk Reference.
November 16, 2009

Cornhole Boards and Pro Sports Logos

nca-blue_display.gifDear Rich: I make and sell cornhole boards. Recently I was contacted by an organization that oversee's trademarks for the NFL, MLB and more and was told to no longer sell our boards with their logos on them because it was trademark infringement. We were using decals, not painting their name or logo on them. I thought if you purchased a licensed item, in this case a vinyl decal, it was legal to use it on a resale item. Does this fall under the first sale doctrine? We state we are not affliated with the NFL, MLB and such. What if the logo was custom made to look slightly different? If you buy authorized team decals and resell them, you're not going to run into a problem. That's permitted under the first sale doctrine (copyright) and shouldn't violate trademark rights. But if you buy team decals, put them on products  (like cornhole boards), and then sell those products, you will have a problem. 
What's the problem? The problem is you're not merely reselling the decal, you're selling a new product -- and you're using the logo/decal to distinguish it from similar products (by associating it with a sports team). Why else include the logo? Custom-making the logos so they looked slightly different wouldn't help -- you're still relying on team associations -- and probably would make it worse since your alterations would now be diluting the mark. (By the way, we answered a related inquiry from a crafts artist, here.)
Toe-stepping Dept. When companies pay big money to become cornhole board licensees, they expect some degree of exclusivity and they expect the leagues to police unauthorized uses. That's why you got that letter. Stating that you're not affiliated with the sports franchises (known as a disclaimer), is not likely to have much impact on your case. Sometimes prominent disclaimers -- for example, large lettering affixed right near a logo -- may mitigate a problem, but it's unlikely to succeed here. (we talk about disclaimers more, here.) The leagues have too much at stake and will vigorously pursue all potential infringers. So, unless you're ready to take them on, the Dear Rich Staff suggests that you either give it up or move your enterprise off the grid.

To learn more about trademark infringement, take a look at my book Patent, Copyright & Trademark: An Intellectual Property Desk Reference.
September 22, 2009

Sports Teams in Kids Book

CubsKids.jpgDear Rich: I have written a children's book that I want to publish. Central to the story is the main character's use of professional sports team names. Will it first be necessary for me to seek permission from the leagues (MLB, NBA, NFL, NHL)? The short and long answer is, 'No,' permission is not required for mentioning sports franchises in a work of fiction. Permission may be required if the name (or logo) of a sports franchise is used in the title or on the cover of the book. (The Dear Rich Staff is unsure of whether you'd prevail in a dispute over book illustrations that use team names and logo imagery so it's probably best to avoid that, as well.) As noted in previous posts, the two difficult-to-predict factors that matter are whether the league learns of your use and whether they consider it worth litigating over .

To learn more about trademark laws, see my book Patent, Copyright & Trademark: An Intellectual Property Desk Reference.
August 25, 2009

Strike Out: Crafts Artist v. MLB

Baseball.jpgDear Rich: My husband has made, but not sold, plaques for our nieces and nephews of their favorite sports team (i.e. Yankees, Giants, Red Sox) as gifts. He carves the logo into wood and then paints them. He has been told by our family and friends, he should make them and sell them at craft fairs. Is this legal? The short answer is that no, it's not legal. The MLB controls all rights to commercially exploit its team names and logos and will hassle those who infringe those rights ... even if it's someone selling MLB fabric tissue box covers on eBay. Of course, in order to get into trouble, somebody would have to find out about your husband's work and complain.  For one-of-a-kind (not mass-produced) work like this, we expect your husband's efforts will be below the MLB's radar (just stay off eBay). 
We could just leave the answer like that -- and you're free to get up and move around the blog if you like -- but your question touches on two sensitive issues for the Dear Rich Staff: (1) How come nobody bought the wonderful book we wrote about crafts law? (2) Why don't we like baseball?
Why Nobody Bought Our Crafts Law Book
The Dear Rich staff has written a lot of books and one of our favorites is the now out-of-print Crafts Law. It was friendly, comprehensive and so helpful. But it didn't sell very well. We tried all kinds of things: promotions at crafts fairs, talking to crafts artists mano-a-mano, and writing columns for a crafts magazine. If you had bought this book and looked for the answer you would have found this helpful excerpt:

"Using trademarks in crafts products. Proceed with caution if you're using trademarks as part of your crafts art -- for example, producing a fabric with a repeating image of the American Express card or producing earrings that feature the Apple computer logo. You may be able to argue that your use is informational and is protected by the First Amendment. However, this argument may be a loser if it looks like you're trading off the success of a trademark rather than commenting upon it. For example, a company that sold trading cards of collectible cars was prohibited from reproducing Chrysler trademarks because Chrysler had already licensed similar collectible products. (Chrysler Corp. v. Newfield Publications Inc., 880 F. Supp. 504 (E.D. MI 1995).) Be aware that making a First Amendment argument means that you've already triggered a company's ire, and you will have to deal with the consequences. This isn't to discourage you from speaking out against corporate branding, just to alert you to the potential morass that awaits if you do."

Anyway... we're not giving up on the crafts world. We're going to improve our crafts book and come out with an all-new version next spring ... so stay tuned!
Why We Don't Like Baseball
We've tried. We enjoyed playing it back in the day. We still try to fit in, often repeating newspaper headlines at lunch meetings -- "I hear Beltram's aiming to rejoin the Mets" or "The Giants better look inward for an opener against the Dodgers." But we lack the honest enthusiasm required. Why? Perhaps it's our upbringing. Perhaps it's our fear of stadiums. Perhaps we're concerned about the environmental impact of all those wooden bats. In any case, we'll look into to it and get back to you.

To learn more about trademark infringement, take a look at my book Patent, Copyright & Trademark: An Intellectual Property Desk Reference.
July 13, 2009

Nicknames and Trademarks

Thumbnail image for baseball.jpg
Dear Rich: I'm trying to get a trademark for a nickname. The nickname has been seen in newspaper articles and media referring to different individuals who accomplished similar feats throughout the years -- imagine it is a nickname like "Home Run King" (although this is not the nickname). I have done an unprofessional trademark search and it seems that nobody has claimed it as a trademark. My friend is the original record holder of the feats referred to by the nickname. Although others have been called by this nickname over the years, and they have come close, nobody has broken the records earned by my friend to achieve the nickname. Now my friend wants to start selling pictures and memorabilia and he wants the nickname to be only related to his name. (My friend has already got the domain name. What class should my friend file in when seeking a trademark. He may be selling lots of things with his autograph: sports equipment, clothing, and my friend also wants to protect his nickname for writing books and making movies. My friend can only afford to start with one class at the moment. Which one would give the most protection? By the way, is LegalZoom a decent company to use? The short answer to your first question is that you should pick the goods or services that you believe will be most lucrative (and for which you wish to preclude competitive use). It all comes down to how you are currently making money, and the ways in which you have a bona fide intent to make it in the future. For example, if your friend is currently entertaining at sports memorabilia shows then perhaps you should seek a registration for entertainment services. If you're selling a lot of t-shirts, then that's the way to go. As for books and movies, you cannot obtain a trademark for the single title of a work, so you would not be able to obtain a registration for those goods unless your friend is writing a series of books. 
What Will Happen When You File
We admire your friend for achieving and maintaining a sports record. Alas, that doesn't assure trademark registration for the accompanying nickname. When you apply for federal registration, the examiner will (among other things) check to see if the term is descriptive, generic or confusingly similar to another competing mark. Usually if the application overcomes these three hurdles, registration is granted. Keep in mind that even if you get a trademark for the nickname, the media can still use the term for editorial purposes -- for example, Sports Illustrated can still refer to other athletes by the nickname. Your registration will only guarantee exclusivity for the goods and services in the class in which you registered.
Trademarks Always Increase Value (NOT!) 
If the record-setting done by your friend is in the past and your friend is no longer well-known, will adding the nickname to merchandise make it more desirable? What's your experience been so far selling merch with the nickname? It's an unfortunate fact that Americans have a short memory (Does anyone remember the most popular actress of the early 40s, nicknamed the "Peek-a-boo Girl"?) 
Filing Your Application
As for using LegalZoom, we must disclaim that the Dear Rich Staff is employed by Nolo, a competitor of LegalZoom that offers a similar program for filing a federal trademark registration. Neither program is necessary for filing -- you can do it yourself at the USPTO and only pay the filing fee. Before using either service, see if you can file by yourself at the USPTO. If that proves too difficult, compare LegalZoom and Nolo to see which offers the most comprehensive help (and post-filing resources). We hope you'll choose Nolo because the Dear Rich Staff devoted considerable effort to providing useful online assistance. Note: No online filing service can guarantee you that the trademark registration will be approved. 

June 10, 2009

Patenting Sporting Event

coach.jpgDear Rich: I developed a new sporting event and would like to find out how I can go about getting it patented or copyrighted? I have read about other types of inventions but not about the development of a new sport. The short answer to your question is that you may be able to patent your new sport but you will have a hard time claiming a copyright. Patents have been issued for new games, (ping-pong poker, anyone?) for variations on existing games (arena football anyone?), and even for competitive techniques within sports (ready to improve your putting?). (You can read more about these sorts of patents in this article.) Under a recent patent ruling a process or method (such as a sport with rules), may qualify for a patent if it affects some hardware -- that is, it is tied to a particular machine, object, or apparatus, or it transforms an object into a different state or thing. In short, as long as your 'invention' includes a physical element such as a football, hockey stick or some other object or hardware, you probably satisfy this requirement.Games.jpg As for copyright, you cannot copyright a system or method (although you can copyright expressions of that game -- for example, a Wii version of the sport, a book about it, or demonstration videos). Of course, the Dear Rich staff notes that your biggest challenge may not be getting the patent, it could be gathering the resources to stop others from playing it without paying you. 
November 20, 2008

NASCAR and publicity rights

racecar.jpgDear Rich: I have a question. I am starting a fan club for a local racer under his parents' request, and this kid is going to make it big. We have already been invited to NASCAR, but that will be at least 3 years away. His family and I want to protect any merchandise from being pirated and his name being used without his permission. We want exclusive rights to produce any merchandise with his name, car, logo, or anything associated with him. What do we do to make sure that he reaps all the profits and not someone just looking to strike it rich off of his fame? I'm so glad you asked. The short answer to your question is that there's no short answer. The local racer -- assuming he's over 18 -- controls all rights to his own publicity or merchandise under legal principles known as the "right of publicity." (If the racer is not over 18, the parents and the racer can sign over these rights, but the Dear Rich staff recommends a new agreement be made once the racer reaches the age of majority.)  So, it's up to him to decide who has the right to use his image and name, and it's up to him to pursue the bad people who use those rights without permission.

Once he enters the world of NASCAR, he will probably be required to assign (give up) most of those rights to NASCAR and his sponsor. NASCAR drivers make money in three ways: they get a percentage of prize money, a percentage of merchandise sales, and earn money from personal endorsements. It's all part of the modern racing world. (BTW, here's a blog where you can learn a lot of fascinating stuff about the business of NASCAR.)  There's an upside to these deals as well, since the team sponsor or NASCAR will be out there purusing the bad guys (which can be very expensive and time-consuming). Also, keep in mind that should this racer become a superstar, he will be able to set the terms of the deals and choose his sponsors.

Got a question for Dear Rich? Send it to dearrichquestion@gmail dot com, and make sure it has the header: "Question."

February 13, 2008

Holy touchdown: The difference between churches and sports bars

goalposts.jpgDear Rich: I have a question. Is it true that our church can't show sporting events like football games on our big screen TV? I'm so glad you asked. Rather than give you a lot of legal backstory about non-musical works and copyright legislation (you can read about that stuff in this Slate article), the bottom line is that you'll likely run afoul of the law if your church uses a TV screen larger than 55 inches. If you do "Drive 55" you'll need a public performance license. Of course, if your flock doesn't mind mixing with infidels, you can move services down the street to a tavern with the appropriate licenses. Or you could just wear your fan gear to church and schedule services an hour later. I wish I had time to go into the relationship between contact sports and salvation -- remember the first time an NFL player kneeled in prayer in the end zone? -- but let's save that discussion for our Sunday blog. P.S. Click here for information on how to measure your TV screen size.

January 2, 2008

Fore!

golf-ball72.jpgDear Rich: I have a question. How do I get a patent on a golf club? I'm so glad you asked, because coincidentally I was just reading about a design patent for a one-fingered golf glove. As you may know, there are two types of patents associated with golf products: design patents which give the inventor rights over design; and utility patents which gives the inventor rights over the functioning invention. You can learn how to get both by reviewing the patent information at Nolo. Or if you're just interested in golf patents, check out Dave Dawsey's Golf Patents website. Dave (the "Golf Lawyer with a Grip on the Industry") tees off daily with fresh IP golf news.

And, if you've already decided to go ahead with applying for a patent for your club, you might find Nolo's Patent Pending Now! software useful for filing that all-important provisional patent application, or PPA.