Recently in first sale Category

April 20, 2009

Repurposing Music Memorabilia

garbagecan.jpgDear Rich: I just came across your blog entry on repurposed goods and the first sale doctrine. My friend and I are contemplating repurposing music memorabilia into household items using recycled products -- for instance, re-covering a garbage pail with old photos of hair metal bands and selling it at a craft show. Will we run into problems and where can we find more information? I'm so glad you asked. The short answer is, "No, you will not run into problems selling one-of-a-kind repurposed goods." You will only run into problems if you make it seem as if the hair metal band endorses your products or is the source of your products. You can find more information about the legal issues in my book, Getting Permission. As for the Dear Rich staff's recommended choices for "can coverage" -- that would be Cinderella, PoisonRATT, Motley CrueDokkenTesla, and the oft-forgotten (perhaps for good reason) W.A.S.P.    
April 13, 2009

Re-Selling iPods With Pre-Loaded Licensed Content

ipod.jpgDear Rich: I have a question. If I license audio or video content, can I load an iPod with that licensed content and resell it? I'm so glad you asked. The short answer is that it depends what you mean by "licensed content." When you buy the Iron Man movie from the iTunes store, you're really licensing it, and you can't resell that type of "licensed content" on your iPod. But if you enter into a license agreement with the owners of Iron Man that specifically permits reproduction and resale on the iPod, then, yes, you can resell that type of licensed content. Similarly, if your band wanted to sell iPods pre-loaded with its music and videos, that shouldn't be an issue (assuming your band owns all rights to its content). But beware starting one of the many business that engage in selling pre-loaded iPods. According to the Dear Rich staff, this is one of the cloudier issues of copyright law and there is no case law that directly answers your question. Note that companies that rip user-owned DVDs to pre-loaded iPods have faced the wrath of the MPAA. Also, as we noted in a previous post, when reselling iPods, you should avoid any implication that you are a licensed Apple reseller or in any way affiliated with Apple.
June 7, 2008

Repurposing copyrights and trademarks: the first sale doctrine

firstsale.jpg

Dear Rich: I have a question. Can a copyrighted or trademarked item be reused or "repurposed," as they like to say in the recycling circles, into a new product for sale without permission? For example, can someone take a cereal box, cut it up, use the front of the box as a notebook cover and legally sell that notebook? Can someone tear a page from a magazine or calendar, fold that page into an envelope and legally sell that envelope? How about a bottle cap? Can someone fashion a piece of jewelry from a bottle cap that is identifiable in the finished piece? I'm so glad you asked. The short answer: Making jewelry from a bottle cap is probably okay, ripping pages from a magazine and selling envelopes could be fine (but ripping pages from a book or calendar may not), and making notebook covers from cereal boxes may lead to trademark problems.

The long answer (zzzzzz) is a bit more nuanced. Here goes: Copyright law permits the purchaser of a copyrighted work to resell, destroy, or do whatever they want to that work, as long as they don't step on any of the copyright owner's exclusive rights. This principle is known as the first sale doctrine, and that's why people can sell used books, movies, and music on eBay and Amazon. The term "first sale doctrine" comes from the fact that the copyright owner maintains control over a specific copy only until it is first sold. (One exception: If it's a limited edition artwork or fine art work -- for example, signed and numbered photographs created in limited editions of 200 or fewer copies -- you can't destroy it.)

Naturally, things aren't always so simple. For example, two cases involving the resale of artwork seem to have arrived at different results. In one case, a company purchased a book of prints by the painter Patrick Nagel and cut out the individual images in the book and mounted them in frames for resale. A court of appeals in California held that this practice was an infringement and was not permitted under the first sale doctrine. (Mirage Editions, Inc. v. Albuquerque A.R.T. Co., 856 F.2d 1341 (1988).) (A similar result was reached in Greenwich Workshop Inc. v. Timber Creations, Inc., 932 F.Supp. 1210 (C.D. Cal. 1996).) In a different case, a company purchased note cards, mounted them on tiles, and resold them. A federal court in Illinois determined that this practice was okay. (Lee v. Deck the Walls, Inc., 925 F.Supp. 576 (N.D. Ill. 1996.) (The same result occurred in C.M. Paula Co. v. Logan, 355 F.Supp. 189 (D.C. Texas 1973).) So, under these rulings, a person cannot rip individual images from an art book and resell them, but a person can mount individual note cards and resell those. Another case added further confusion when a federal court ruled that the purchaser of a bundle of software programs could resell the individual components (separate programs on CDs). (Softman Products Co. LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc., 171 F.Supp. 2d 1075 (C.D. Cal. 2001).)

You definitely want to take some care selling repurposed items that contain trademarks. Although you're free to sell empty cereal boxes, you want to avoid implying that the cereal company is endorsing or is associated with your notebook products. That's going to be tough to do if the cover of your notebook is identical to the cover of the cereal. Consumers will necessarily confuse the two and likely think the cereal company is selling notebooks (not a major leap, considering they sell to kids). A prominent disclaimer may help -- for example, a statement that your business is not affiliated with or endorsed by the trademarked company. But who's going to want to look at a big disclaimer on the cover? Whatever you do, don't play up the trademarks you use in your company's marketing or business name. For example, it's not a good idea to name your website "Cheerios Notebooks." Finally, as with all issues like this, the lower you are on a company's radar -- that is, the less you sell -- the more likely you are to avoid any hassles.

January 17, 2008

I'm exhausted...

exhaustion.jpgDear Rich: I have a question. Yesterday there was a story in the news about the Supreme Court and 'patent exhaustion.' What is patent exhaustion? I'm so glad you asked. Patent exhaustion is a legal doctrine that basically says that once a patent owner sells a product, the patent owner cannot seek further patent payments for that particular product. So, for example, if you buy a patented lawn mower, the patent owner cannot demand further royalties if you resell the mower or if you make your living mowing lawns. The principle is also known as the "first sale doctrine," a term that also applies in copyright law for a similiar principle. For example, if you buy a copyrighted item such as book or DVD, you are free to resell it without paying the copyright owner. Wait, does that rule apply for copyrighted software? Hmm... that depends on where you live. In some states, courts have held that software isn't sold; it's licensed and can only be 'resold' under the terms of an end-user license agreement. But is software protected under copyright or patent law? Actually, it can be protected under both. If software is protected under patent law, does the first sale apply to patented software or is it considered to be under license? Could I answer this some other time? I'm exhausted.